My action research project goal is to determine if the campus climate
can be improved by allowing the teachers to voice their concerns and opinions
regarding the schedule. When I sent my initial blind survey to assess the
campus climate, I was surprised to see that the overall climate average was
higher than what I thought it would be (which would lead me into a new project
if I was actually an administrator- why is the climate rated so high when we
have so many grouchy people?). I then sent my second survey which gave the
teachers and staff opportunities to comment on different areas. I was so
excited to see that people really opened up and were honest. My administrator
gave me the go ahead to send the survey and collect all the data. So, the
survey came from me, not administration, and I think that really helped people
open up. I have compiled the surveys and handed them over to my administrator.
We have planned a day to sit down and dig in to the schedule for next year. I
still need to sit down with each grade level, between now and the meeting with
my administrator, and get their input. Our biggest challenge is the PE rotation
schedule. I plan to ask each grade level their two preferred times, then try to
work around everyone. We also have to consider our RtI pullout. The RtI teacher will be
meeting with us to discuss the schedule. We are hoping to have more time slots
for her to pull kids. Right now, she is limited in the amout of kids she can
get to. The purpose of our meeting is not only to create the new schedule, but
also to look at our teachers and possibly move some around.
Sunday, March 24, 2013
Monday, March 18, 2013
School and Community Relations Week 4
Title of Family-School-Community Partnership Project
|
Parent Meetings Revamped
|
I. Data-Evidenced Student Need
|
We are a Title I district with many students performing
below grade level as shown in our istation reports, weekly assessments, unit
assessments and benchmark scores. Our parental involvement is very low.
|
II. Benefits for Student Achievement
|
Research shows that student achievement levels are higher
when parents are involved and/or supportive. If we can reach more parents to
build relationships and give them information regarding what is going on in
their child’s classroom and how to help at home, we can directly impact
student achievement.
|
III. Proposed Activities/Strategies
|
Draw in the parents with a student performance or
open-house type setting, then incorporate the informational pieces that we
want to share with parents.
|
IV. Proposed Process
for Planning and Implementation
|
I will present my plan to the faculty and staff, then ask
for suggestions. After suggestions are considered, we would need to meet
again and discuss exactly what these meetings will look like. If we do them
on the same night, we would need to have multiple meetings in order to accommodate
the parents with children in multiple grade levels. Our 2nd and 3rd
grade teams also work as partners. We would need to allow time for parents to
visit each teacher’s classroom.
|
V. What You Want from Your Audience
|
The teachers are the ones that are going to have to be
prepared to present information at the meetings so they have got to be
supportive and onboard. I also would like for there to be collaboration all
the way around. The teachers need to be involved in the process (own it) for
them to ‘buy in’ and make the meetings successful.
|
Sunday, March 17, 2013
Action Research Update
Last week I finished gathering and printing my online surveys. I gave a copy to my administrator to look over. Our next step is to sit down and discuss the information gathered through the surveys. I will be taking a day to spend with my administrator to accomplish this.
Wednesday, March 13, 2013
School and Community Relations Week 3: Evaluation Process
Describe the evaluation process that
you will use to assess the outcomes of the proposed family-school-community
partnership.
|
My goal is to increase the number
of parents who attend grade level informational meetings by incorporating
them with Open House or a student performance since more parents seem to
attend those meetings. We use sign in sheets for every meeting we have. I
will be comparing parental attendance numbers from this year (when the two
types of meetings were not merged) with next years numbers (when the two
types of meetings will be merged. I will also gain teacher opinion through a
survey. I want to know how successful they feel the new meetings have been
and if they feel they have better informed parents because of the new
meetings.
|
What are the
measurable goals that you have established for the proposed
family-school-community partnership? What criteria will you use to determine
if the partnership has met those goals?
|
We have
low parental attendance at informational meetings and high parental attendance
at Open House or PTO meetings when the kids perform. By merging the two types
of meetings into one, I feel that it is difficult to set a goal. I hope the
number of parents who attend the new merged meetings will represent at least
80% of the grade level’s population. I will measure this by using the sign in
sheets and counting the number of kids that were represented. I can then
compare the data with the data for each type of meeting from the previous year.
I also
hope that the data will show a positive impact on student achievement for those
students whose parents attend. I can measure this by looking at their grades
and talking with the teachers to see if they feel the students are performing
better after the meeting.
Another area that needs to be looked at is
parent/teacher communication. Hopefully, by getting more parents to school, our
staff can begin to foster relationships with parents, in turn making them feel
more comfortable coming to school and supporting us at home. |
How do you envision
using the data that will be generated from the evaluation process?
|
I hope the increase is significant
and I plan to report back to my faculty after we have had the meetings during
the next school year. I will share with them the percentages of the previous
year’s meetings and the percentages from the new meetings. If we receive
positive increases and I feel that is a valid argument to continue the
combined meetings.
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)