Session Purpose:
Identify weak areas in math through disaggregation of data and discuss
approaches to improve in those areas.
|
|||||
Learning
Objective to Be Addressed: Improve Weak Math Areas
|
|||||
Approving
Principal: M Reynolds
|
Presentation
Date: Jan 6, 2014
|
||||
Grade Level:
2nd
& 3rd
|
Facilitator:
K Grimsley
|
Location:
GES
|
Start Time:
9:00
|
End-Time:
10:00
|
|
|
|||||
Learner-Centered Activity
|
Purpose
|
Description
|
Steps
|
Estimated Time
|
|
Review most
recent benchmark data (broken down by teacher) and list the 3 lowest and the
3 highest areas.
|
Teachers are
looking at their own data and finding their strong and weak areas.
|
Each teacher
will bring his or her print out from Aware (our data tool). They will look at
individual TEKs and list their 3 strongest and their 3 weakest TEKs.
|
Print benchmark
data
List 3 strongest
and 3 weakest areas
|
10-15 minutes
|
|
As a grade
level, compare and compile your strongest and weakest TEKs.
|
Teachers can see
where they are similar and different regarding their strengths and
weaknesses.
|
As a group, the
teachers will take turns sharing their findings. They will compile a list to
share with the other grade level.
|
Come together
Take turns
sharing findings
Compile a list
|
15 minutes
|
|
The whole group,
lead by the facilitator, will review findings and share strategies for
improving these areas.
|
Teachers will
gain knowledge from each other regarding new techniques or strategies to use
when teaching specific TEKs.
|
As a group, we
will look at weak areas, chances are, someone was strong in that area. We
will share out strategies and techniques to try.
|
Look at the
first weak area.
Ask if anyone
had this as a strength.
Share out
strategies and techniques.
Teachers take
notes.
Repeat for each
weak area.
|
30 minutes
|
Saturday, December 7, 2013
Learner-Centered Professional Development Session
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)